Draft #1 Summary_Reader Response: "How can Southeast Asia’s clean energy transition be sped up?"
In the
article “How can Southeast Asia’s clean energy transition be sped up?”, Daubach
(2019) addressed the challenges faced with the transition towards clean energy,
and discussed possible solutions to help accelerate the consumption of clean
energy in the region. The author stated
that Southeast Asia is a region with diverse stages of development, where a
single solution is not applicable to the entire region. Southeast Asia is the
only region in the world where the dependence on coal to produce power has
increased, contributing to the production of carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas,
into the atmosphere. The article also mentioned Singapore, whereby utilizing
conventional forms of clean energy on a large scale may not be suitable. The
article then highlighted nuclear fusion, which has great potential due to its
advantages. However, reducing the usage of energy is equally important, which
can be achieved through district cooling. The government and private sectors
should also form closer partnerships to reduce cost in key sectors.
While I
found the challenges and solutions discussed insightful, the author could have
chosen a more comprehensive approach in discussing the solutions, by
considering other aspects with relevant examples.
The author
explained the advantages of nuclear fusion, and mentioned that existing nuclear
fusion facilities are not capable enough to generate electricity on a large
scale. However, there are other aspects that the author did not cover. For
instance, the potential health risk involved with nuclear fusion. While nuclear
fusion does not produce long lasting radioactive materials, there is a
possibility of tritium being released into the environment. Tritium is
radioactive and difficult to contain, as it is able to infiltrate certain
materials like, concrete, rubber and even steel. It also mixes well with water,
and can enter a person’s body through several ways, like being inhaled, eaten
or being absorbed through the skin. Even though there is a small quantity of tritium
in the reactor, huge amounts could be released during normal operations through
leaks, and an accident could release even more tritium. Fusion reactors also
pose several issues, for instance, a large parasitic power consumption. This means
that a substantial amount of the power produced, is being used by the reactor.
This process is known as a “parasitic
power drain, and there are two types of power drain. The first refers to when important
systems external to the reactor must remain operational, even when the fusion
plasma is inactive, and the second refers to the power required for controlling
the fusion plasma.
Apart from the potential health risk, the
public's view and agreement is also essential, as certain parts of the region may
not be comfortable with the use of nuclear power. For example, in Malaysia and Thailand, the public’s
acceptance towards nuclear power continues to be low. Nuclear accidents have also occurred in the past, like the Fukushima Daichi nuclear power accident which
took place in Japan in the year 2011. This incident has highlighted the issue
of nuclear power safety, and has continued to be the public’s most pressing
concern.
The article
also states that policymakers and business should work together to speed up the
usage of clean energy. However, it does not give examples as to how both
parties can work together to meet this goal. One way to
achieve this goal is through establishing a training centre. This could create
opportunities for businesses to share their ideas with policymakers, to help
them better understand renewable energy. For instance, the Sustainable Energy
Association of Singapore (SEAS) and Asian Development Bank (ADB) have launched
a training centre, which will train government officials in the region on
policy, financial, and technological issues relating to clean energy in an
effort to help countries accelerate their usage of renewable energy.
Although the
solutions discussed by the author has the potential to speed up the consumption
of clean energy in Southeast Asia, a more comprehensive evaluation of the
solutions should be made.
(655 words)
References
Daubach, T.
(2019, July 19). How can Southeast Asia's clean energy transition be sped up?
Retrieved from https://www.eco-business.com/news/how-can-southeast-asias-clean-energy-transition-be-sped-up/
Nuclear
Fusion Power. (2019, July). Retrieved September 27, 2019, from https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/nuclear-fusion-power.aspx.
Putra, N.
A., & Andrews-Speed, P. (2018, June 28). Prospects for Nuclear Power in
ASEAN. Retrieved September 28, 2019, from https://thediplomat.com/2018/06/prospects-for-nuclear-power-in-asean/.
Jassby, D.
(2017, April 19). Fusion reactors: Not what they're cracked up to be. Retrieved
September 28, 2019, from https://thebulletin.org/2017/04/fusion-reactors-not-what-theyre-cracked-up-to-be/.
Shah, V.,
& Chaem, J. (2015, March 26). Meeting Southeast Asia's ambitious clean
energy targets. Retrieved September 28, 2019, from https://www.eco-business.com/news/meeting-southeast-asias-ambitious-clean-energy-targets/.
Comments
Post a Comment